The line graph illustrates the number of tourists and local people who travel in the UK and overseas respectively, during 1979 to 1999 and the bar chart describes the majority of the UK citizens who visited internationally tour in the famous 5 countries across the years. Overall, it can depict that the portion of the UK residents had the most significant number in million during travelling aboard. Whereas, the lowest number in million had visited by UK general, people in the Turkey.
To begin with, In 1979, the figure of UK citizens stood with 13 million and slightly increased in 1984 up to 20 million. Subsequently, this trend shown dramatically rose across a decade up to 55 million people. What is remarkable is the tourists who visited the UK shown gradually risen up to 28 million in 1999, whereas on the other side, mostly UK residents visited in the France up to 12 million, which is the almost half of overseas travelers in the corresponding year.
Furthermore, It is worth to mention that in 1999, the portion of UK residents had also visited Turkey, Greece, USA and Spain, where Spain got 9 million visitors and the rest of the country got under 5 million travelers from the united kingdom respectively, throughout the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ents had the most significant number in million during travelling aboard. Whereas, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 432, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...g aboard. Whereas, the lowest number in million had visited by UK general, people in th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... To begin with, In 1979, the figure of UK citizens stood with 13 million and sl...
^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as travelers in the corresponding year. Furthermore, It is worth to mention that...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...respectively, throughout the period.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 1615.20841683 65% => OK
No of words: 213.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92488262911 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80836735435 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544600938967 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 506.74238477 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.8300448299 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.857142857 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253769991913 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127447775732 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691222777742 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181307096367 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469562659317 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.