Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages.
Education is the backbone of a nation and the development of a country largely depends on its educational policy. The rapid development of the world and the ever-increasing competition are two reasons so many young students and professionals are looking for university education these days. The high cost of university education is still a reason many talented individuals cannot afford to get a higher degree and I strongly believe that it should be the government’s responsibility to make the education free and bear the expenses of university education.
First, the government has a huge budget for the development of education sector and the money could be better utilised by ensuring university education for talented individuals. The government already funds the public university education and taking full responsibility of the cost would ensure quality education for all. The difficult admission process in the university level filters out the talented students to take part in university education and they should be backed up by the government funds to let them concentrate on their studies. In order to encourage graduate students and professionals to further their education government should pay for their courses as it would bring more benefits in the future for the country. Many European countries have already implemented this method and they have a huge number of skilled professionals who not only serve the country but also the whole world.
More importantly, when citizens would be assured that the government will bear the cost of their children’s university education, they would be more interested in preparing their children for the university degree rather than sending them to work and earn. This would have a tremendous effect on the education level of the whole country. By supporting university course fees, the government would create more skilled professionals and without them, the development of the nation is quite impossible in this ever-accelerating era or science and technology. This is an effective method to drive more motivated and talented young towards the higher education and preparing them to take the leadership of the nation.
In conclusion, paying for the university course fees by the government is indeed an effective measure for ensuring quality education for talented individuals and for an overall progress of a nation. It is a symbol of prosperity, better education policy and reassuring the citizens. So I reaffirm that the university education costs should be paid by the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'overall progress'.
Suggestion: overall progress
...cation for talented individuals and for an overall progress of a nation. It is a symbol of prosperi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.3376753507 384% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42857142857 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15624335228 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448621553885 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7758075704 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.4 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13666726167 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060040094959 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345961577617 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09729729091 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173223195507 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.78957915832 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.