Computers are now the basis of the modern world. They should therefore be introduced into classrooms, and their programs used for direct teaching purposes.
Argue both sides and give your opinion.
In the ever-changing world of technology, there is an ever-increasing demand for new ideas in every aspect of life. The issue of whether computer programs should be applied for direct teaching purposes has triggered intense debate. In my opinion, I tend towards the view that students can benefit from learning with computer programs.
On the one hand, dependence on computers in teaching may carry a certain degree of risk to students. To begin with, it is possible that regular face-to-face contact between teachers and students will disappear due to the emergence of computer programs. Students may spend a large amount of time on computer screens instead of talking with their peers. In this way, the application of computer-based teaching method probably results in a lack of group collaboration and interaction among classmates in an educational environment. Therefore, it can be concluded that this way of teaching has certain adverse effects on students’ communication ability.
On the other hand, I contend that students can reap a number of benefits owing to this computer-based teaching method. First of all, frequent exposure to computer offers them a good grasp of computer skills, which is essential for their future careers. In the present day, computer literacy is, in all probability, an indispensable requirement that almost every recruiter seeks in a résumé. Secondly, the computer-based paradigm provides students with an unlimited source of knowledge and information. This encourages students to produce their own creative work, and thereby comprehend the information more efficiently. All in all, a form of computer-based education plays a prominent role in student’s intellectual development, especially their creativity.
In conclusion, there are convincing arguments both for and against the application of computer programs for direct teaching purposes. It is my personal belief that the potential advantages for this idea far outweigh the possible drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64569536424 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2805413014 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4380733865 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.5625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210377603484 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754727100846 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709082424615 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148801136761 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499102092913 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.