Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Art is the ability of creation. No creative art will appear or live long while governmental restrictions are governing. However, absolute freedom will be problematic when society is not artistically mature. Hence, the government should act only as a regulatory body who tries to keep a balance among different sections of the society.
First and foremost, governmental restraints will result in partiality of artworks` assessment. So the arts take priority depending on the extent of their adherence to the rules not their innovation. Thus, a poor diversity of the arts will limit artistic arena of a country that affects both people and artists. The repetitive pattern of artworks makes people uninterested; fewer writings are read since no various content have been introduced and fewer artistic events are welcomed since copied productions have exhausted audiences.
On the other hand, artists will look for a new channel to present their ingenious perspectives. Immigration is mostly the only option which can lead to a decline in artworks quality due to economic or mental problems of immigration. Similarly, inside the country, the quality of art education will fall because bounded artistic minds are in the educational positions. This is a crisis situation where art growth is a matter of profound concern.
Benefiting society, art also has a dangerous face. It can be offensive to some while being inspired to others. Governments prefer constricting on arts to prevent any probable disturbance or criticism of itself. But, this is not an occasion on which a modern society will be based. A modern society has deeply realized that the best reply to an artwork is a corresponding artwork.
To conclude, governmental restrictions kill both creativity and art, conversely, absolute freedom causes anarchy. In order to neither confine inventiveness nor making disorder, governments should behave as a regulator who promises freedom of expression for all in safety and put its effort into growing awareness of whole society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, look, similarly, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41692789969 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.051050654 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623824451411 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9126612327 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9473684211 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14194009872 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420243850707 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355099805781 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814765455512 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323381433322 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.