Development in technology causes environmental problems. Some people believe the solution to these problems is everyone accepts a simpler way of life, while others say that technology can solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that the question of whether science and technology can handle environmental pollution or simple life is the way to conserve the environment remains a controversy. While some people believe ordinary life is better to protect the environment, I would agree that high-tech is an efficient way to tackle the problem.
On the one hand, the option to choose a traditional way of living is attractive for some reasons. Firstly, this lifestyle help to preserve the environment. Due to avoiding using fossil-fuel vehicles or machines that are operated by oil and gas, the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere which is released from those transports and machines will be decreased. From that, there will be more fresh air and some kinds of pollution such as water contamination or air pollution will decline. Secondly, the traditional lifestyle also ensures humans’ health. Because of the reduction of pollution, the atmosphere is cleaner, which insure people's health. The residents can use eco-friendly transport like bicycles or hiking. Regarding to those benefits, the resistance of citizens can be enhanced, which helps against heart diseases and respiratory problems.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe a way of living full of science and technology is a better choice. The reason for that is that this lifestyle is convenient for both humans and the environment in some ways. Regarding the former, the development of technology helps them in communication, education, entertainment, and means of transportation. For example, a modern private car can do a variety of things such as watch films through a small TV, make a phone call by a virtual assistant, and can go thousand of miles at a high speed. As for the environment, science and technology discover renewable energies such as solar or wind which will replace fossil fuels in the future. Moreover, the development of science also helps in solving environmental problems. For instance, the disaster prediction system can find out and give solutions to reduce the risks of disasters.
In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that it is better to live in a high-tech environment than the traditional lifestyle.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether science and technology can handle envir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n efficient way to tackle the problem. On the one hand, the option to choose a ...
^^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...call by a virtual assistant, and can go thousand of miles at a high speed. As for the en...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25905292479 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07325792943 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545961002786 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.486280255 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208953581973 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601326680702 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545376463743 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13126252588 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868044902746 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether science and technology can handle envir...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n efficient way to tackle the problem. On the one hand, the option to choose a ...
^^^
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...call by a virtual assistant, and can go thousand of miles at a high speed. As for the en...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, apart from, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25905292479 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07325792943 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545961002786 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.486280255 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208953581973 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601326680702 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545376463743 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13126252588 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868044902746 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.