Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations.
There is no definite answer regarding if our current way of life will cause a negative effect on the future generation. Some people may think that the way of life is innocuous for the future generation, while others believe that it hurts the future generation. In my opinion, I agree with the latter for several reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the following paragraphs.
First of all, countless 3C products cause a negative influence on the environment in the future. To be more concise, smartphones contain a few metals and toxic chemicals, and the rate of changing a phone is so rapid that people usually buy a new phone every two years. After getting the new phone, the old one will be sent to landfills; as a result, the metals and toxic chemicals will decompose in the soil and contaminate it. You see, drawing from a study, a well-known study shows all people discard cellphones about a hundred million every year in the United States, not only causing stress on landfills but also leading to a negative impact on the soil. For this reason, our current way of life has a detrimental influence on the future generation.
Furthermore, overcutting trees has a detrimental effect on our health in the future. Nowadays, students have to read tons of books made from trees. In other words, the more books people make, the more trees they cut down. As the number of trees decreases, there are not enough trees to absorb carbon dioxide and cut it down. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my personal experience. I remember that when I was in the last semester of high school, a great number of books were discarded like huge hills, indicating a huge number of trees had been cut down. Consequently, people will be exposed to the air filled with carbon dioxide, catching dry throat and pneumonia. It’s certainly clear to see why our current way of life has a negative effect on the future generation.
Admittedly, some people may oppose me regarding this statement. For instance, people could reduce the rate of changing a new phone and get second-hand books from students who are graduated. However, it is impossible to force people to stop changing their phones; not all students accept to receive old books. Hence, I am of the opinion that our current way of life harms the future generation because of the need for smartphones and books.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, well, while, for instance, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77697841727 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63509989823 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508393285372 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7641484254 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290430242707 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854215343564 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952112965929 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175088542493 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769589340401 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.