Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation.
In such a civilized society, in spite of several disagreements people have in various areas so far as one’s view goes, one point that virtually everybody approves upon is the importance of government support in people’s lives. This is the mostly owing to the fact that people always have been expected some essential practical issues in order to have a comfortable life. With this in mind, a broad range of controversial attitudes might stimulate heated debates as to what kind of prominent support should be injected to the society from governments. Two sides often form in this regard. Those who trust that spending money to improve internet access is better, while others who think the improvement of public transportation is superior to the other choice. I personally consider myself among the latter group. Among the many reasons one can give for this opinion, two conspicuous reasons will be elaborated and investigated through ensuing lines.
One reason coming to mind at first is air pollution that has been a major crisis for every society in recent years. Needless to say that with population growth, the number of individual automobiles will increase dramatically and thus exhausted toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and sulfuric chemicals, which are so detrimental to humans and environment, will be released to the atmosphere. For instance, Air pollution problem in Tehran has been caused some bothersome illnesses and beginning of lung cancer in people. On the other hand, improvement accesses to public transportation such as subways, which are fastest and convenient, will encourage people to use them and thus will have a great influence in the reduction of dirty gases in the air.
Another equally important reason is that there will be an effective economic growth in society. Using public transportation allow people to save their time and money. Take an example of a person who wants to go his office in the early morning. Not only it is possible to reach the office late but will consume more time and money in a traffic and noisy condition as well which will make him so anxious due to not to emit some endorphin in the brain that is responsible for his cheerfulness. A recently conducted study at Sharif University of technology, it was found out that consumption of oil fuels will decrease exponentially if just 30 percent of people use public transportation that will result in a significant growth on economics.
In conclusion, there are many reasons which can be persuasive enough for governments in order to improve accesses on public transportation that will have some essential benefits for society. Based on the given reasons above such as air pollution and economic growth, I highly recommend that governments should put more emphasis on using public transportation by encouraging people. Otherwise, we will annihilate our planet gradually by our own hands.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have always been
...he mostly owing to the fact that people always have been expected some essential practical issue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2439.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 473.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15644820296 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93404350871 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551797040169 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 775.8 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.0600703553 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.368421053 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8947368421 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13095058561 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395143801935 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054022808015 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865481705463 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361258634467 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.