Packaging is necessary to retain quality and maintain safety of the product. Sometimes the product with excessive package is a quite unnecessary to customers as well as manufacturers. Some people think that consumers should not support this by avoiding the purchase of over packaged products, while others argue that product manufacturers should take a step by reducing the package volume. I am inclined to believe that this excess packaging of the product should be stopped at producer level. The following paragraphs will analyse its disadvantages and suggest other best possible solution.
First of all, people expect some products like snacks should be less packed or unpacked. So that can be consumed on the move easily. But most of the food products are packed in plastic wrappers and cardboard sheets, which people will litter on the streets and cause environmental pollution. For instance, McDonalds is the first company, introduced over packaging food products with plastic wrappers and covers and encouraged people to eat on the go.
Second of all, manufacturing companies are reducing the quantity and quality of the products by increasing the packaging materials to survive in this competitive market. Consequently, packaging material manufacturers are making more profit by introducing advanced packaging materials. Instead, the product producers should invest in improving the quality of the products. For example, Amazon online delivery products are packed with multi layers of heavy plastic materials which are discarded and sent to landfills.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that over packaging of the products does not add any value and the producers should avoid it by investing more to enhance the quality. Further, it is expected that the people make cognizance of the fact and avoid over-packaged products.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...acks should be less packed or unpacked. So that can be consumed on the move easily. But...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, second, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53146853147 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90009198517 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559440559441 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4609191688 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.466666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326596208606 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115239625984 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664901916325 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212146995125 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561894957296 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.