Does travel help to promote understanding and communication between countries?
We live in globalized world, in which travelling is increasing day by day. Traveling have many pros. The relation between two countries is maintaining by traveling.
First of all, travel is the link between two countries. Folk can get many benefits, because of travelling. People can know various cultures in various countries, as well as, lifestyle of different countries. If, folk visit the country then, they look at their evolution, so, they can also built a same development in their particular country. Folk can learn various types of languages and apply in the way of communication.
Albeit, countries can knows the idea from another countries. The relationship also improves between two countries with the help of travelling. People can change their way of communication, because of travelling. Furthermore, country shares their ideas by travelling. For an example, the prime minister India, The Naredra Modi visit the different counties and create a good relationship with all, so, when, India need help from other country then, they will help to India. So, relationship and communication is a based on travelling.
On the flip side, I would like to say that, every coin has two sides. So, travelling has disadvantages also. Due to travelling, terrorist activity also increases. There are chance to supply of drugs, venom food etc. So, country can get trouble from the travelling. But, advantage of travelling outweighs the disadvantage.
To pen down, we can conclude that, travelling is the key to maintain good relation between countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'build'
Suggestion: build
...k at their evolution, so, they can also built a same development in their particular ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...sides. So, travelling has disadvantages also. Due to travelling, terrorist activity ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'as well as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246621621622 0.247107183377 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.152027027027 0.155533422707 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0540540540541 0.0946595960268 57% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0439189189189 0.0501214627716 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0337837837838 0.0437548338989 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128378378378 0.122226691241 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0439189189189 0.0403226058552 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00432684199 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0202702702703 0.0326793684256 62% => OK
Particles: 0.00337837837838 0.00163938923432 206% => OK
Determiners: 0.0777027027027 0.0861772015684 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0337837837838 0.021408717616 158% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00675675675676 0.011925033212 57% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1557.0 1933.35771543 81% => OK
No of words: 247.0 316.048096192 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.3036437247 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20517956788 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348178137652 0.374742101984 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.295546558704 0.28420135186 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.226720647773 0.203846283523 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.182186234818 0.137316102897 133% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00432684199 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.037074148 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566801619433 0.56093040696 101% => OK
Word variations: 56.1726011064 60.7387585426 92% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0891783567 131% => OK
Sentence length: 11.7619047619 20.7743622355 57% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5438066126 49.517814964 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.1428571429 127.492653851 58% => OK
Words per sentence: 11.7619047619 20.7743622355 57% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.814263465372 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 41.3165606324 49.1944974215 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.82352941176 1.69124875643 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182500577418 0.332605444948 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.110430005629 0.102741220458 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.08150753204 0.0668466124924 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.471880371524 0.534860350844 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159540969458 0.148594505496 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063372997979 0.134430193775 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604369480034 0.0742795772207 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.279518027378 0.324371583561 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0901270566021 0.0638462369009 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116478766967 0.228012699653 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549647040659 0.058150111329 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.41683366733 263% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 9.0 1.9629258517 458% => Less neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 20.0 10.4468937876 191% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.