With the development of socio-economic areas, urban areas have become more overpopulated and it leads to some social as well as health risks for those who are living in the cities. Therefore, some people argue that they would not live in the city because of these negative issues. However, I totally disagree with this viewpoint for concrete reasons.
First of all, the life of the city has been considered as the best place to earn money. It is lucid that manual workers and skilled employees have great opportunites to find a good job with high salary due to industrial zones which are established in cities. Meanwhlie, in the countrysides, it is impossible for laborous to apply a good job to make money. Thus, living in the city is still an ideal spot to have stable turnover although people cope with crimes or contaminated environment.
Another important thing that people who are living in urban areas have better health service and better standart of living. It may be true that most hospitals with advanced technologies are located in big towns. Hence, if citizens who live in urbans are suffered from serious diseases such as diabets and cancer, they have better opportunites to be cured and looked after by competent doctors and nurses. Moreover, people live in urbans have a large amount of money and they can enjoy both material and cultural life thanks to theaters, cinemas and supermarkets. Therefore, people still would like to live in city has increased from 10 million to 20 million between 2010 and 2018 in Tashkent.
In conclusion, by analysing above mentioned facts and allegations it is evident that although persons surely deal with social and physical issues, they may have a strong determination to live in city. These reasons can be indicated such as high revenues and available services to meet demands of improving standart of living.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98076923077 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68634871675 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570512820513 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6691479114 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211606315494 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695848824391 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422300353062 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128070975999 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404312801641 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.