It is often said that language disappearing is not crucial since it may make an easier living over all the countries. I completely disagree with this statement and I believe that there are several negative meanings for the disappearing.
On the one hand, an existing language means the culture of a historical country. We may always discover that the Hong Kong protesters are protecting Cantonese, which is the original language in Hong Kong, as soon as the government is going to promote Putonghua to be the new formal language instead of Cantonese in Hong Kong. The reason for the forceful objection is that the local culture such as Cantonese music will vanish if the original language is abolished. Therefore, the influences of the local culture are serious by the language disappearing.
On the other hand, the surviving language represents the certification of a country. The strongest example would be the evidence that the formal languages of each existing country are also different, for instance, Korean, Japan and France own their self-language separately. The significance is that the establishment of an own language is necessary for a certificated country, nowadays, we would not see that the official language of a country comes from other countries. Thus, as long as there is a death of a language, a country will be invaded as well as disappeared by others clearly.
In conclusion, because of the disadvantages, like the vanishment of typical culture as well as the existence of a country, are outweighing the positive consequences, I believe that the circumstance of language disappearing is vital for the public or even the world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15241635688 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12261904709 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516728624535 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0015995528 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208546693967 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844977512655 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0127936818543 0.0667982634062 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124536944781 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195742241746 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.