‘Failure is proof that the desire wasn’t strong enough’
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Many people thinks that failing means that the motivation for winning was not there. However, there is countless other who would believes otherwise.
Success and failure are both arbritary. There is a well-known proverb that goes "Failure is the pillar of success". It means that one can learn from their mistakes and past trials and try again and try better. So, if you want to succeed, you must try and understand what you could have done better in previous try-outs. The hope for a favourable outcome always drives people to work harder than ever. On the other hand failing to achieve something only disheartens them. Only then, some people fall into despair thinking they do not have the passion to win and become successful. But, it is not true at all.
Physics legend Sir Einstein had failed countless times in life to reach a point where he was a simple office clark in his youth. But that exact situation had helped him to discover the "Relativity Theory". Same can be said about another physicist, Sir Stephen Hawkings; who although had major physical disability, never shied away from pursuing his dreams. The tallest mountain on earth, Mount Everest is build on the deadbody of its climber who fell into their death while climbing it. But such distressful outcome have never demotivated new climber to reach the top.
Failing does not mean stopping. Men have failed in history only to find more efficient ways to win and be star in their own field. You only fail when you loose faith in yourself. So one must not give up but work more enthuistically when the time rises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'believe'
Suggestion: believe
...ever there is countless other who would believes otherwise Success and failure are bot...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tless other who would believes otherwise Success and failure are both arbritary T...
^^^
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: TRY_AND[1]
Message: "Try and" is common in colloquial speech, but "'try to'" is recommended for writing.
Suggestion: try to
...tter So if you want to succeed you must try and understand what you could have done bet...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 600, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome successful But it is not true at all Physics legend Sir Einstein had failed c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72627737226 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38445212014 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638686131387 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 274.0 20.2975951904 1350% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1295.0 106.682146367 1214% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 274.0 20.7667163134 1319% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 58.0 7.06120827912 821% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0738841322374 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738841322374 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0422404431328 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027866660412 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 137.8 13.0946893788 1052% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -189.71 50.2224549098 -378% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 107.8 11.3001002004 954% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.63 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 20.45 8.58950901804 238% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 111.6 10.1190380762 1103% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 10.7795591182 520% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.