fast food restaurants are becoming more popular than ever all over the world. What are the possible causes and effects of this phenomenon?
These days, the number of business establishments serving fast food is on the rise. This essay will suggest that the principal causes of this issue are convenience and affordable price it offers and then describe the possible effects, namely high quality of food service and the change of traditional eating habit.
Several reasons can be associated with the increasing popularity in fast food stores. The primary cause of this phenomenon is due to significant advantage. It is hardly deniable that nowadays, the increasingly more people tend to lack leisure time to prepare their own meals, which subsequently leads to make a choice to eat out with family and friends in order to have chance to enjoy other attractive activities instead of being busy in the kitchen after a bustle day. In addition, this development of fast food place benefits not only the time-saving convenience but optional diversity for dishes as well. A typical example of this is Hanoi which is a capital of Vietnam. The evidence for this can be seen in a research of the University of Adelaide, South Australia, shown that Hanoi is the center for global food and resources in which the consumers can easily find a place to eat. The promotion of fast food restaurant can also be attributed to competitive price among eating places, resulting in being beneficial for consumers to have the best choice of reasonable price to take food.
The growingly more restaurants serving fast food is likely to lead to both positive and negative effects. First, the most obvious impact of the flourishing number of eating places can be observed in high quality of food service. This is because the popularity of fast food restaurants contributes to the competitive environment, bringing the requirement of fulfilling the user’s satisfaction, thus the food quality is one of the most important points paid attention by the investor’s restaurants. On the other hand, the detrimental impact of the rising fast food stores is the dramatic change of traditional eating habit caused by the import of international food trend in a country, which tends to endanger the traditional cuisine.
In conclusion, the developing number of fast food stores is a legitimate problem that are affecting amount of consumers. This phenomenon stems from convenience and reasonable price and results in both positive and negative impacts such as outstanding quality of food service and the change of traditional eating habit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e change of traditional eating habit. Several reasons can be associated with t...
^^^
Line 2, column 716, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...m. The evidence for this can be seen in a research of the University of Adelaide, South Au...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ice of reasonable price to take food. The growingly more restaurants serving f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...of reasonable price to take food. The growingly more restaurants serving fast...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to endanger the traditional cuisine. In conclusion, the developing number of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17206982544 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93873530587 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503740648379 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.071222472 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.266666667 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242963703216 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966112703414 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445105806849 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161426557467 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298398898919 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.