Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions.
Visiting tourist attractions costs more for foreigners than domestics. This rule seems fair to me in some extent and I will explain why:
Spending money on the journeys abroad and enjoying others’ culture and history has been accepted by travelers. But, in some cases, they have to pay extra prices compared to local residents. For example, museums often have two different prices for foreigners and local visitors, and sometimes the former is ten times higher than the regular cost. Tourists believe that it is unjustifiable.
On the other hand, I believe that some priorities for the nation has to be established in each country’s attractive sites. The first reason that the price should be lower for locals is that they might come to see them multiple times during their lives. As a result, they are likely to spend more money overall in comparison to a one-time visitor. In addition, each country’s culture and history belongs to its nation, and if they have access to it more easily, they can feel more belonging towards their traditions.
The tourism sites require a lot of expenses in order to be catered and repaired. Selling tickets is a way to compensate for a portion of said expenses. The more money the government acquires by selling overpriced tickets to tourists, the more likely it is for these sites to be conserved.
In conclusion, it appears to me that although tourists might not be satisfied by paying extra money, this rule has its own advantages for all people in their host country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-02 | quang1944 | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | Johndavisvu | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 61 | view |
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while other believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both view 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Many people today are worried about cybercrime such as hacking and identity theft What problems does cybercrime cause and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take 56
- Many people today are worried about cybercrime such as hacking and identity theft What problems does cybercrime cause and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take 47
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lowed', 'lowered'?
Suggestion: lowed; lowered
...e first reason that the price should be lower for locals is that they might come to s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92578125 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64438699754 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578125 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8806881544 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297257701864 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934768588222 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746257827818 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141601025785 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554555305472 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.