Fossil fuels are the main sources in many countries, but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is it positive or negative development?
It is irrefutable that fossil fuels have played a vital role in producing energy in many nations. However, there has been a rapid evolution to the substitute resources of energy over the past few years. From my perspective, this is a positive development which can bring considerable benefits.
First of all, the amount of fossil fuels all over the world is limited and non renewable since each kind needs millions of years to form. The current rate of overproduction of energy is the main reason for the depletion of fossil fuels in nature. Therefore, producing energy from fossil fuels lacks sustainability, thus the use of alternative sources of energy such as wind or solar powers should be encouraged. The consumption of energy generated from fossil fuels tends to increase with the growth of the world population. For instance, notwithstanding the warning made possible by the government, individual transport usage like car and airplane still increase. This leads to numerous fossil fuels such as oil and gas overexploited in oceans for energy production supplying humans' demand.
In addition, fossil fuels' consumption all over the world is considerable the main culprit of global warming and environmental degradation. It is widely acknowledged that burning oil and coal in domestic and individual activities are producing tons of carbon dioxide and other detrimental chemical substances per year. As a result, the ozone layer is getting damaged from air pollutants, which cause acid rains affecting people's health. Furthermore, a significant number of transportations are being used, which is generating exhausted fumes and greenhouse gases in almost nations in the world. The government should encourage manufacturers producing eco-friendly systems operated on solar or wind power. Individual should use public transports to go work as well as electricity saving to protect the environment.
In conclusion, I am strongly of the opinion that the utilize of alternative resources is necessary and positive for the aforementioned reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...sion, I am strongly of the opinion that the utilize of alternative resources is necessary a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48264984227 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16640683006 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.5706093484 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.625 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263603581965 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0776059241646 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809530667373 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139249953654 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850519916879 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.