It is estimated that all sorts of transports including cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The solely individuals commuting inside these vehicles will be passengers. It seems to me that this development will bring us more benefits than drawbacks in the future.
On the one hand, perhaps the secureness of such development is the major merit to the society as a wholl since that vehicles will be managed by specific robots rather than human drivers who may make mistakes by ignoring the safety procedures. Examples can be seen in the statistics which claim that there are numerous errors made by human drivers in the main highways which may result in car accidents, suggesting that if the cars were regulated by the smart robots, this would suddenly lead to the decline in the devastating incidents of transport crashing and even would result in
the decrease of death toll in that cases. Moreover, it seems that if this development occurs in the future there will be no need to driver licenses and thus analyzing the rules and regulations might not be compulsory and necessary as human intervention in driving will not be the case in the next following years.
On the other hand, it appears that there are some deme zies of this approach. Firstly, it means the loss of jobs of drivers which would inevitably lead to some dillemas such as the increasing unemployment, causing damages to the families whose breadwinner is driver. Secondly, it must be said that there will be also a scarcity of jobs in the sector, which is concentrated on providing licences to drivers, as a result of driverless method.
To sum up, it seems logical to conclude that the pros of this kind of tendency seems to be overwhelmingly positive and I feel that this collosal advantages transcend over the disadvantages
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who'll
... is the major merit to the society as a wholl since that vehicles will be managed by ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, i feel, kind of, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91176470588 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77683374962 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552287581699 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.4544334587 49.4020404114 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.3 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 7.06120827912 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300214772733 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127775784699 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105602745432 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166932510112 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975270865069 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.