It is true that, in this contemporary era, technology is being advanced day by day at an unprecedented rate. As a result, most experts predict that all vehicles follow an automated driving system and run without a driver in the future. According to my perspective, certainly merits of driverless vechiles outweigh the demerits.
To start with, traffic problem is a gigantic obstacle in metropolitan cities because everyone wants to purchase their own vechile for commuting. Eventually, when all transportation system would be connect with one system then all cars travel in equal distance so chances of accidents would be decrease or transportation system would work fast. Secondly, is safety, people do not know how to drive a car or sometimes they drive in distracted state or while drinking or might fall asleep. However, if they would purchase their drivless cars so they can do everything whatever they want while driving. For example, Tesla company is a well known company in all over the world due to its driverless cars. That is why many cars are being purchased by people. Furthermore, they know the importance of their time as well as safety.
Looking at the other view, it might be create some security issues. When whole system would be attach by one system and follow same protocols so if any hackers can hack this type of system which may create vast adversity in front of people on roads. Another reason could be, unemployment. To exemplify, according to a survey, it can be manifested that, more than 45% of people are drivers and they are earning their bread and butter while doing hard work.
In addition, when we apply automatic system in busses, taxis, and other transport so these type of people would have to find new job.
On a concluding note, undoubtedly, people may have to face some problems in security or in unemployment rate yet, we must understand that these types of technologies are paramount for us if we want to be developed. In the last, if authorities will create new employment opportunities for people and make some draconian rule again security so we would not have to confront any difficulties.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result, as well as, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96675900277 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79532543308 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573407202216 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1351805839 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.470588235 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35294117647 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203429156401 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634320767636 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327768689799 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101441082014 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341527018483 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result, as well as, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1793.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96675900277 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79532543308 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573407202216 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1351805839 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.470588235 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35294117647 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203429156401 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634320767636 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327768689799 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101441082014 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341527018483 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.