IN the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. TO what extent do you agree or disagree?
Due to the globalization, searching for more accommodation on other planets such as Mars has become of great importance. Although I agree that it is more difficult for human to continue living on earth, I would argue that it is not necessary for the government to invest more money in searching for shelters on other stars. The reasons are presented below.
On the one hand, although industrialization helps boost a country’s economy and ensures global citizen’s life quality, it should also be responsible for the pollution such as air pollution and soil pollution which have negative effects on people’s health. In addition to this, the rapid increase in the population also poses threats to the Earth. The more people are born, the fewer lands there will be. For these reasons, our planet’s capacity is being reduced.
On the other hand, no matter how serious the problem is, I do not think it is important for the authorities to spend a large amount of their budget on investigating alternative living places on other planets. Firstly, this spending seems to be very expensive owing to a great deal of funding on specially-designed machines and equipment, which may significantly influence the nation’s economic development. Secondly, it is obvious that despite numerous analyses on the living condition on the Moon and Mars, for example, there have been very few proofs of any living creatures there. Therefore, instead of allocating the budget to these non-beneficial experiments, we should take measures of environment preservation and birth control into more serious consideration. Only by doing this can we improve the earth’s sustainability, making it a worth-living place.
In conclusion, I disapprove the idea of spending a large amount of expenditure looking for places to live on other planets as it is overpriced and worthless.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
2023-08-15 | vanphat1032003 | 95 | view |
2023-01-23 | Harman97 | 73 | view |
2022-11-28 | lucluc | 73 | view |
2022-11-17 | chaupnh | 73 | view |
- Some people think that buildings such as flats and houses should be designed to last a long time Others believe that it is more important to provide accommodation quickly and cheaply Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Certificates in foreign languages such as IELTS TOEFL and TOEIC have become more popular than ever before and many schools consider them an advantage for enrollment Do you think this is a positive or negative trend 65
- khanh huyen Some people think that buildings such as flats and houses should be designed to last a long time Others belive that it is more important to provide accommodation quickly and cheaply Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 84
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27609427609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20116860159 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9599603665 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30981572055 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992133225313 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622833563096 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173585045256 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578198003288 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.