In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In present, most people realize that it is difficult to survive on the Earth in a few decades later. Thus, they believe to invest more money on space program, in the way to find the second Earth where human and other organisms could live on. However, I prefer finding other solution to spending a huge amount of money on research to find planet to tackle this problem.
It is true that several factors cause damages on the Earth, making difficult to live these days. One of the main factors is that government and society confront pollution issues. Water is the essential thing that we need to fulfill in our daily life, such as drinking, taking a bath, and cooking. Unfortunately, several cases happen that the water is contaminated by rubbish and chemical wastage causing the death of fishes. Moreover, increasing diseases as a result of, water pollution threaten human being. Similarly, air pollution makes people cannot breathe freely, so they should put on masker in daily routine. For example, in Beijing, many people suffer from respiratory problems caused by fumes of motor vehicles and factory. Due to this issue, experts offer the solution to search new planet living on.
On the other hand, I would argue that it is wasteful to lay out much money into space research. There is opportunity loss in a huge budget because this research program gives uncertainty over the success in the future or do not obtain an expected result. From my point of view, it is better to spend money developing or discovering new advanced technology able to decline the causing and the effect of pollution. It is better to maximize the use of renewable energy such as wind and sun. For example, experts doing research on physic collaborated with engineers to produce an electric car which only needs sun as the power supply to ride it.
To sum up, spending budget on space program is more wasteful than investing money to develop or discover new technology, such as eco-friendly vehicles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 813, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olution to search new planet living on. On the other hand, I would argue that it...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, thus, for example, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1654.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90801186944 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54831363559 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59940652819 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2868402039 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2941176471 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23427128687 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628371390165 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485404502658 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132532834482 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524571818607 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.