In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying. To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement?
With the fast pace of technological development, it is not uncommon that eBooks and online newspapers are more dominant because they are free of charge. In my opinion, I firmly agree with this statement that these online media would replace the regular ones not only because of their convenience but also their environmental benefits.
To begin with, it is an undeniable fact that people nowadays have smartphones that can access the Internet from everywhere. It also means that information can be available at any time in a day with just a few clicks on the screens. Moreover, printed newspapers and books usually present the information through words and illustrations that seem to be less realistic as compared to their online counterparts, which have the help of technology to unfold the possibility of uploading videos and voice records. Hence, this is where the proliferation of online news sources would arrive.
Furthermore, fewer printed newspapers and books mean less deforestation. In order to produce a ton of paper, seventeen full-grown trees are needed to fill in the process, but a tree requires at least thirty years to reach its full growth. To bring it further, this case would only happen if the trees are planted at an appropriate tropical climate with plenty of water supply because it would be hundred of years in cooler regions. Therefore, if we kept producing printed magazines and books along with many potential environmental threats that deforestation would bring, the world would run out of trees before humans could even realize it.
Admittedly, people would argue that the credibility of printed media is much higher because they are usually thoroughly checked, edited, and censored prior to their publication. However, many governments have also established regulations about protecting the Internet environment from unreliable sources.
To sum up, I believe that the constant advancement in technology would make online newspapers and eBooks take over the position of their printed fellows due to the convenience and environmental impacts that they would bring to humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut also their environmental benefits. To begin with, it is an undeniable fact ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of online news sources would arrive. Furthermore, fewer printed newspapers an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...nty of water supply because it would be hundred of years in cooler regions. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... before humans could even realize it. Admittedly, people would argue that the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... environment from unreliable sources. To sum up, I believe that the constant a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, at least, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31137724551 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92440033549 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577844311377 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5227251208 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.461538462 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163674716363 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062032696613 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445606948819 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969920314994 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331641750738 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.