The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming richer and the poor are growing poorer What are the causes of this what measures can be taken to reduce this problem

The growth of industrial capitalism in the west during the 1950 and 60s paved the way for the entire world to follow suit. Thankfully, this revolution has left the positive fruition and led to prosperity for small sections of the population. However, the political and financial pundits believe that the middle class people are squeezed further everywhere in the world. This essay discusses the burning issues and offers some solutions.
‘Greed is good’- that has been taught at all premium schools and a lot emphasis has been put on expanding capitalism. Unequivocally, this mindset business tycoon has helped most gains going to the top. Invariably, this greed at the top levels leaves a sluggish income growth for middle and the bottom level workers. The situation today is so bad that it could cause enormous domestic upheaval. What is more, ordinary people live with the fear of instability and inequality at all the time. Convinced that a few tycoons are getting rich at the expense of the rest and it is not a perception, but a naked truth.
The world is developing on the edge of a sword. Both ethical and political reasons are there to address the growing gap between rich and poor. Despite policymaker are well-versed with this terrible predicament, it is a hard job for them to resolve this economic mess. This situation has resulted in a hue and cry among people the people. For instance, we have witnessed the backlash such as the austerity protest in Europe a few years back.
The only resolution to this colossal crisis for the government is to introduce the income redistribution and to ban the speculation of essential commodities on the exchange market. The income redistribution measure involves social investment job training for adults and early childhood education while the ban on speculation will fight against rising inflation.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, well, while, for instance, such as, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07817589577 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80386595877 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605863192182 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8010658867 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7058823529 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181899776748 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511307191847 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558379302847 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959181734157 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555863712988 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.