“Genetic engineering is an important issue in modern society. Some people think that it will improve people's lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both opinions and give your opinion?
In recent few years, genetic engineering has been becoming a subject of increasing concern in today society. Many people suppose that this advanced technology might be harmful to human life and all creatures in the world. However, others think that it plays a vital role in the development of society, and I agree with this opinion.
On the one hand, genetic mutations can cause a number of serious consequences in various aspects. Firstly, humans can become victims of genetic tinker and suffer strange diseases when they eat GM products. For example, if customers eat genetically modified foods not tested on the safety for human beings, they could be exposed to weird illness even cancer. Secondly, the development of genetic engineering could threat the ecological environment. It is obvious that food chains could be broken if crops are resistant to predators. Consequently, GM crops might change whole ecosystems.
On the other hand, I argue that recombinant DNA technology can make a significant contribution to the prospect of human life. In terms of food security, crop modification can address the increased food demands of people around the globe. Because genetically modified crops are a great way to produce a huge amount of food in a short time period and with less money. In addition, human’s life expectancy would be longer thanks to genetic engineering. For instance, scientists can use genetic engineering to change gene structure before a baby is born, which allows doctors to terminate inherited illnesses running in their family. As a result, innate morality would decrease considerably.
In conclusion, although some individuals think that genetic engineering can cause a wide variety of damages to modern society, I argue that this advanced technology has positive effects on the development of human beings.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34364261168 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90951060241 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0531286871 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1875 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19036995208 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603660977866 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462090131976 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12665276682 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521066264361 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.