Global Warming
Recently, the phenomenon of global warming and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world. Although it is a widespread belief that the matter of preserving of the environment is highly beneficial, a fair number of academic researchers view this from their theoretical perspective. Nonetheless, I am inclined to believe that one should carefully weigh up the pros and cons of it.
From a social standpoint, ozone depletion is inextricably bound up with deforestation, which means it might be a deciding factor in both desertification and co2 emission. For example, a prestigious university undertook a longitudinal study in 2015 to demonstrate the relationship between fossil fuels and rising in the earth temperature as well as deforestation rate. Not only were the findings somewhat inconsistent with those of previous studies, but also some convincing evidence presented thus far support the contention that pollution is correlated positively with diesel oil.
In political terms, renewable energy is undoubtedly attributable to modern technology, in that it would lead to electric cars, solar power, and wind turbines. According to my first-hand experience, a vivid illustration of such attributions is greenhouse gases, which are cause for concern since our modern society has overlooked in taking it for granted. Hence, the dominant role of new sources of energy apparently can be seen.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe that the advantages of academic research in global warming are of more significance. However, the local authorities are recommended to amend some existing legislation to minimize undesirable side effects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ming and its profound impact has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, however, if, look, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58113207547 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28710654219 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698113207547 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8103640808 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.454545455 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134447427773 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472178169528 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10016411568 0.0667982634062 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08508917356 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866863912127 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.