It is argued that government should allocate more fund in safeguarding the nation and little should be spent on the provision of basic social needs. I strongly agree with the statement that says, more money should be given to defence department of a nation and less should be spent on social amenities. This will be explain in details in my essay discussion.
To begin with,it is very crucial for a country to ensure that the safety of people's lives and properties are put into consideration. If there is tight security in the community, people can always sleep with their eyes closed.since social devices such as robbering and kidnapping are put under control by the department. Also, spending more in beefing up the security of a nation,helps in encouraging local and especially international business organisations to establish in such nations. As they guaranty that investment will be safe. This in return will burst the economic of the nation. Because business can easily flourish and grow.
Furthermore, stability of a country encourage job creations. Once there is no civil war or unrest organisations can create jobs, Thus, this will provide employment opportunities for workers. For instance, Dangote investments that deals with manufacturing of cements can employe community members to work in their companies.
Although, government should also consider in ensuring that there is social amenities for citizens to enjoy. Because without them people's life will not be comfortable. For example, provision of motorable roads for workers to ply when going to work.
In conclusion, i strongly opined that government of a nation should spend more money to beef up the safety of the nation. Thus, both life and properties will be secured.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... in my essay discussion. To begin with,it is very crucial for a country to ensure...
^^^
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , helps
...e in beefing up the security of a nation,helps in encouraging local and especially int...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nisations to establish in such nations. As they guaranty that investment will be s...
^^
Line 4, column 60, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are social amenities'?
Suggestion: there are social amenities
...t should also consider in ensuring that there is social amenities for citizens to enjoy. Because without ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...social amenities for citizens to enjoy. Because without them peoples life will not be c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...government of a nation should spend more money to beef up the safety of the natio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23214285714 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9395070217 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6734959577 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1764705882 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137974308806 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399343506013 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062262799676 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794867876326 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594401284261 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.