Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in investing money by the government for the development of fine arts including painting and music. There is a widespread worry that this will not lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that these various forms of arts are vital for the growth of a nation, therefore, need government support to survive and thrive in the country. Not only can music and painting induce discipline in people but can also give them a chance to shine in these field nationally as well as internationally. It hardly needs mentioned that these merits stand the country in good stead as far as development is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that music and painting are the two varied medium of expressing the emotions and this sector deserve the investment to acquire the desired development. Besides, the government is responsible for providing citizens with liberty to adopt any form of art to thrive. For example, Australian government invested 30 percent budget for supporting the art in the year 2017, and as a result, improvement in people artistic sense increased 50 percent. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of dedication the hefty amount of budget for the art.
In view of the arguments outline above, one can conclude that the benefits of investing in the field of art are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs mentioned" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'mentioning' or 'to be mentioned'.
Suggestion: mentioning; to be mentioned
...ell as internationally. It hardly needs mentioned that these merits stand the country in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83763837638 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79138548034 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557195571956 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7003686738 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10703312147 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367393598496 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383159803404 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633803094117 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219651775819 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.