In recent decades government allocated huge funds to explore space to seek other lives while others against and claim that authorities should spend money to deal with our pressing problems. I partly agree with the second statement due to our planet damaged over the last 10 decades by the impact of people and we must save this planet to the next generation.
To begin with, since the middle of 20 centuries huge countries have competed to conquest space via creating new modern technology such as rockets satellites which contributed to investigate other planets far more deeply. For this reason, tremendous budgets wasted for researching new lives or planet which habitable for us while authorities forgot threat come for our planets. For instance, preventing climate change or retaining endangered species all these challenges require multiple expenditures which promote to avoid inevitable consequences which mold the future. If governments or special organizations will provide their attitude to tackle this issue through allocating money which presently allocated to discover the planet we can preserve this undesirable accident.
Secondly, the last 2 decades the amount of sick newer generation is rising owing to the detrimental condition of the environment. Thus, according to USA statistics, it can be seen that most influence is living in tremendous cities and if the government spend it to seek treatment for sicks it will be a bit more beneficial than researching planets.
To conclude, exploring spaces to find new places for the environment is vital but putting emphasize to solving our planet quite significant.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'decades'' or 'decade's'?
Suggestion: decades'; decade's
In recent decades government allocated huge funds to expl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39607843137 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87491370246 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658823529412 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.3797921922 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.888888889 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150349012868 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581210352596 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665437683193 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833926641168 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594183562892 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.