The graph below shows the difference in wheat export over three different areas.
The supplied linear chart exhibits that information about the wheat export by the Australia, Canada and European community during the 1985 to 1990.
Overall, it can be incurred that the Canada before experience the major variations it was reached at the same proportion while the European export was increase and the Australia export was decreased.
Primarily, it is vividly apparent that wheat export in the 1985 in Canada, it accorded at 19 million tonnes. After, experience minor dip, in 1986 it went up dramatically and peak up high it noticed at 25 million tonnes. Whereas, it plunged down steadily and it recorded at 14 million tonnes then, it recovered at the same ratio where it started.
Similarly, it can be observed that the trend of Australia and European opposite with each other. In the foremost case, during the first years 1985 and 1986 the European export fall down slightly 16 to 14 millions. However, it picks up and constant in the next two years. During, the later years, it inclined suddenly and it noticed the highest rate in the 1990, it recorded at above 20 million tones. Whereas, in the latter case the Australia export had grown steadily in 1985 and in before increased in the 1987 it was declined in 1986 then, it reduces continuously and it accorded at nearby 10 millions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | linhdk35 | 56 | view |
| 2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | englishessays | view |
- The graph below shows the difference in wheat exports over three different areas. 56
- in the past when students did a unversity degree they tended to study in their own country . nowadays they have more opportunity to study abroad. what are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 61
- The graph below shows the difference in wheat export over three different areas in 1985 to 1990. 73
- The graph below shows the difference in wheat export over three different areas. 11
- Some people believe that for children learning about the local history is more important than know ing the world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, similarly, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85650224215 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55128971489 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515695067265 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.0 506.74238477 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.724700116 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.3 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0676703832043 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299492832737 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342362743548 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516864176301 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192512933863 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.