Nowadays Human interaction with animals is one of the most substantial issues that been raised by animals protection groups and syndicates. Undoubtedly, animals are there to ensure humanity progress and survival. But, unfortunately animals are other living creatures that feel much pain as human do.
Decades ago, animals were one of the most vital and important means of transportation through centuries, whereas people were used to utilize it in their travels between countries, nations and districts. For example merchants used to travel for displaying and selling their merchandises for foreigners in different places across the world. Consequently, this kind of utilization cannot be avoided or neglected in such important purpose that demonstrates humanity persistence for existence.
According to most of the history documents, the human has employed animals to have a better life from the time that civilization has come to existence. In fact, the skin of animals has been considered as the first material for clothing industry and human has used the meat of them as a delicious food. These days, people spend money for these purposes.
On the other hand, there are a number of researches and experiments were been conducted on animals for unnecessary outputs. It has been shown on a numerous occasions by secret filming in laboratories that a substantial amount of researches was done for cosmetics, not to find a real cures for diseases.
In addition to that, animals been kept in cages for long period, suffer and feel pain without any businesslike result. It was proven in many occasion by animals groups and syndicates that these animals feel pain as much human do. We puny human have had the thought that there is not much we can do to protect and nurse the animals
In conclusion, I believe despite the fact that there are a number of reports and evidences of the mistreatments of animals for unnecessary purposes, people still need to employ and exploit animals for their sustainability, progress and prosperity. In the future I think authorities and NOG’s need to pay more attention and to grant sufficient guidance to upgrade people’s consciences about the right of treating animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... substantial issues that been raised by animals protection groups and syndicates. Undou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, still, whereas, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22752808989 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95891335184 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2202350487 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.066666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7333333333 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339805466228 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1167296182 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465864766665 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175064879244 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251827060354 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.