A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that human must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, there has been dividing opinions regarding role of animals in human lives and animal rights. Some people claim that animals should be granted rights and respected by humankind, while the others hold a belief that animals must be employed for different purposes for us, including food supply and research resources. These two opposite views will be discussed in this essay.
Although animals lose ability to express thinkings to human, it is impossible to deny the fact that animals still have their own lives. In other words, nature has given all animals, including us, rights to live and protect themselves from enemies. What is more, animals for long time has had to suffer from pain and human cruelty. Millions of livestocks have been euthanized for human food supplies and even some endangered species have been constantly threatened by poachers and habitat loss. Thus, it is crucial to stop exploiting animals for human purposes and animals themselves are worth gaining stronger protection from human.
However, people could terribly suffer from food scarcity if animals were free from human exploitation as meat from certain kinds of animals are playing an indispensable part in our everyday’s meals. Also, meat provides essential nutritions for us to grow and develop normally, prevents us from being undernourished. In addition, some animals are also provided for wildlife research. These research are necessary as it will aim to find solutions to combat current environmental issues and protect the biological diversity. Although we can minimize the number of harmed animals, animals are still essential for us and we cannot live a life without the presence of them
To sum up, while it is true that animals should be respected and treated as humans, animals still play a vital role in human life, notably providing meat and resources for further scientific projects. In my view, instead of jettisoning the use of animals, we should encourage local authorities and companies to limit the use of wild animals and natural habitats to protect them from being threatened.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | mytinh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | snowacealex | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Alexspector | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Lê Nguyễn Hạnh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | bapcai | 73 | view |
- The percentage of the population living in urban areas has greatly increased in many countries Discuss some reasons for this change and some of its consequences for urban planning 93
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people believe that the arts should receive subsidies or sponsorship from government and big companies Others feel such spending is a luxury and that it would be better if it were invested in scientific projects Discuss both views and give your own o 90
- Do you think life will be very different in the near future 78
- The importance of biodiversity is being more widely recognized as increasing numbers of species come under threat What can be done to maintain biodiversity 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 560, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: animals
...gh we can minimize the number of harmed animals animals are still essential for us and we canno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, still, thus, while, even so, in addition, in my view, in other words, it is true, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12759643917 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58124080827 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543026706231 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 337.0 20.2975951904 1660% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1728.0 106.682146367 1620% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 337.0 20.7667163134 1623% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 139.0 7.06120827912 1969% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427325722565 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.427325722565 0.084324248473 507% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28782607787 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646832078074 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 171.2 13.0946893788 1307% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -270.58 50.2224549098 -539% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 134.7 11.3001002004 1192% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.95 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.47 8.58950901804 285% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 9.78957915832 541% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 136.8 10.1190380762 1352% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 10.7795591182 492% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.