The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
Mass production as a result of the growth of consumption has indeed led to several environmental issues. The most significant ones are related to greenhouse gases and disposable goods. However, viable solutions can be taken by governments and corporations to tackle the problems.
To begin with, there are two main negative impacts resulting from mass production. The first problem is correlated with the increasing level of greenhouse gases. During the manufacturing process, a plethora of by-products is released into the atmosphere. For example, burning coal or diesel furnaces which provide heat to power many plants prove to discharge an enormous amount of carbon dioxide. Also, the insatiable demand for good consumption nowadays results in the throwaway lifestyle with the introduction of disposable goods, most of which are non-biodegradable. In other words, once becoming waste, these single-used products last for centuries before decomposing completely. This, therefore, undoubtedly leads to irreversible soil pollution.
However, there are preventive measures that can be promptly taken to mitigate the potential environmental deterioration. First and foremost, environmental sustainability in business should be promoted with the use of eco-friendly and recycled materials. An analogous example of this is Nike’s environmental initiative in which sustainable products are made using recycled polyester. Additionally, governments can also incentivize companies to pursue sustainable manufacturing processes. To be more specific, tax breaks and incentives can be provided for firms using green business strategies.
In conclusion, while the increase in manufactures does exert adverse effects on the environment including the greenhouse gases emission and disposable goods’ influence on the quality of soil, there are still feasible solutions that need the joint efforts of both governments and corporations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03284671533 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37171962953 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.282249318 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179498552225 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537617809498 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295593507929 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972253235863 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217121182397 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.