An increasing number of people are buying what they need online. What are the advantages and disadvantages for both individuals and companies?
As the digital era proceeds, people are switching to cybershopping, which is believed to have gradually overwhelmed the traditional method. In actual fact, there is a rising trend that people prefer purchasing online to going to store. The following essay will examine both positive and negative impacts of the phenomenon on buyers and suppliers.
The tendency of buying products over the Internet can be attributed to the fact that shopping becomes far easier. Considering individual perspective, purchasing from online stores can be time-saving as well as convenient. This indicates that customers can place orders online without the need of traveling to brick-and-mortar stores. On top of that, purchasers have access to an extensive range of products so as to select the most suitable one at a reasonable price. As for retailers, an advantage of owning an online business is the considerable reduction in commercial fees. The expenses associated with website maintenance and hiring assistant are minimal in comparison to the cost of retaining business premises. Online platforms such as Amazon and Ebay help sellers expand the customer base and globally reach potential shoppers.
On the contrary, cyber security is indeed an alarming concern. Individuals may suffer from information leakage as identity fraud is becoming more sophisticated. Moreover, because clients are not able to see the product first-hand, therefore, scammers are inevitable. Furthermore, online enterprises ought to rival fiercely for credibility and market saturation in order to attract customers and increase revenue.
To draw a fair conclusion, the risk of using this method is completely conceivable. Nonetheless, the habit of shopping online has diffused to the point of possessing the market with its competitive edges and outweighed the demerits. Hence, it brings about benefits for both individuals and companies as well as enormous economic resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
... overwhelmed the traditional method. In actual fact, there is a rising trend that people pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ccess to an extensive range of products so as to select the most suitable one at a reaso...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, as for, as to, such as, as well as, on the contrary, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61904761905 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12188574055 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65306122449 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.0637641526 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.1764705882 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220852682861 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568053078958 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520567558003 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112006913444 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232800623869 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.