Currently, the level of traffic and pollution problems are growing. Some people believe that the best solution to overcome these problems is by increasing the petrol fare. I completely disagree with this view and opine that there are more effective measures to tackle this issue.
The reason why I disagree is because increasing petrol fare will not stop people from using their private vehicles. This is because people do not have another comfortable and safe option to travel to their destined places. Hence, the best option for them is by using their own transportation. Instead, the price of commodities will also increase because of the increase in petrol fare, and will cause country's economy to suffer.
Meanwhile, other options that can be done to reduce traffic and pollution problems more effectively are improving existing public transportation and providing more affordable fees for public transportation. This is because, public transportation which are safe and comfortable will attract people to ride them. As a result, the number of citizens who ride public transportation will increase gradually. Moreover, if public transportation has affordable fees, people will more likely to be willing to ride them. Consequently, more people will turn from their private vehicles to public transportation. For example, public transportation in Singapore is great and has affordable fares which cause a lot of people to ride them. As a result, the level of traffic congestion and pollution in Singapore is low.
In conclusion, I completely disagree that the best solution to overcome pollution and traffic problems is by increasing petrol fare because it will not stop people from using their private vehicles and will cause other commodities price to rise which will lead to the suffer of economy. However, there are other more effective solutions which involve improving existing public transportation and provide more affordable public transportation fares.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: REASON_IS_BECAUSE[1]
Message: Probably an incorrect phrase. Use 'the reason 'is that''.
Suggestion: is that
...his issue. The reason why I disagree is because increasing petrol fare will not stop pe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...dities price to rise which will lead to the suffer of economy. However, there are other mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47540983607 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98356332161 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419672131148 0.561755894193 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1129822108 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.375 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156248939739 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642169221127 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048179782345 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126080757441 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453144260184 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.