Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problems are present day reality and people are now raising their voices to address this issue. However, it is said that it is the government and corporate sector responsibility to improve environment and not the individuals responsibility. This essay will discuss in detail why I believe that this issue can only be solved if both state and individuals play their part in improving the environment.
The governments and large companies can definitely make a huge difference by playing major role in the improvement of climate. Firstly, they should make clear policy about environment and its improvement, such as legally binding the industries to treat their waste chemicals before releasing in the environment. Secondly, those vehicles which release toxic smoke and cause pollution should be taxed by the governments. Finally, the large companies and industries should not only strictly follow the state guidelines regarding the improvement of environment but also help the state financially. The money can be used to run different projects.
However, the individuals can also play their part, in making the environment safe for living, along with the state. They can help the state by following the rules devised to improve the environment, such as by properly disposing off the waste, using eco-friendly vehicles, by recycling and up cycling most of the home generated waste, in order to decrease the burden on dumping yards. Furthermore, people can help governments in plantation drive to increase the area covered by forest which can help in the improvement of climate. These measures by individuals can definitely help in making the environment worth living.
To conclude, despite the main role of state and large companies, I believe that individuals can also help in the improvement of the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 87
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 61
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...lity to improve environment and not the individuals responsibility. This essay will discuss...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37282229965 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03949407008 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540069686411 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0296351999 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.615384615 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307049336097 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127847539173 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815151726209 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194902300971 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398629715712 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.