It is argued that the internet has changed the method people convey and absorb information. Several unprecedented problems, including inappropriate arguments and misleading information, have resulted from this tendency and should be tackled by a number of effective solutions from the government and residents.
There are two main issues stemming from information exchanges on the internet. To begin with, some websites display inappropriate content such as violent actions or reactionary content. Without internet censorship, users can easily access such sites, which could possibly cause deviant behaviors. Another problem is the spread of misleading information. This is because the internet allows people to upload information to social media platforms without verification, leading to the widespread dissemination of misinformation.
Since such issues are serious, the government should immediately take steps to address these problems. Firstly, the government should ban extreme content from users’ access. For example, the Vietnamese government cooperated with social media such as Facebook to remove posts that damage the reputation of politicians, building the trust of citizens in the authorities. In addition, the authorities can impose stricter laws to punish those who spread misleading information on the internet. For instance, people who posted misinformation on social networks about the Covid19 pandemic were punished heavily such as big fines or even being prisoned.
In conclusion, while sharing and acquiring information on the internet can result in the spread of inappropriate and inaccurate information, these can be combated with stricter punishment on those disseminating misinformation and probation on malicious content. This is a joint effort by both authorities and citizens which can hopefully address these problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 257, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...ers can easily access such sites, which could possibly cause deviant behaviors. Another proble...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00377358491 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17586125258 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588679245283 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0824537065 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155202828107 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572709422678 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444410528657 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987155672644 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441978459907 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.52 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.