These days, access to information has dramatically increased with the advent of the internet. While I agree that this is a positive development, I believe that it can be detrimental for individuals and society.
Admittedly, the benefits of more access to information as a result of the internet are many and varied. Firstly, it is convenient. This is because we can read various materials about world events in our comfort zones, without visiting any cyberstore, as long as we have an internet connection or a working WiFi as well as a computer or smartphone. Also, the internet never closes, there is round-the-clock access, which enables everyone to get information according to their commitments. Furthermore, students are not left out as it has helped them to complete their school projects and write their thesis without visiting the library to search for paper books and other resources the traditional way.
Nevertheless, despite the advantages, I think that not everything on online platforms is always accurate. One obvious issue is that anyone can write articles without the material going through any screening medium.Wikipedia, for example, is a good illustration for this as the contents posted by different people on this website sometimes contain many errors, which can lead to misinterpretation and misrepresentation. Another problem is that the bloggers can write fabricated stories about celebrities and other popular people in society just to bring them down. What is more, the media also put up fake news about the government just to cause chaos between the ruling party, the opposition party and the citizens. Hence, not everything on the cyberspace is always true.
In conclusion, although the increased access to information has brought both convenience and flexibility, I completely believe that there are more drawbacks than benefits associated with this phenomenon.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause both social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- People nowadays prefer to interact online e g do shopping chat with friends rather than talking to other people face to face What are the reasons for this Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exa 92
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Is it a positive or negative development 82
- The internet has vastly increased our access to information To what extent do you think this is a good thing Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should spend about 40 minutes on this ta 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 215, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Wikipedia
...rial going through any screening medium.Wikipedia, for example, is a good illustration fo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, so, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4222972973 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18668126024 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601351351351 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4610148995 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.461538462 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6153846154 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182747039423 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572586019511 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409741522207 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112493391636 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015144481033 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.