It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it’s sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become good sports person or musician. Discuss the two ideas your opinion.
There is the argument that several individuals are good at certain areas such as music and sports since birth. However, I think that not only geniuses are excellent in these fields but also others can do so.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that many children when they are little kids owned a natural ability of a specific subject. These students are capable to understand thoroughly knowledge transferred by mentors at more parallel pace than others a lot. Even, geniuses can research themselves into every subject in which they interest without any guidance. It is obvious that intelligent persons always reach the highest results which can only be dreams of normal ones. Therefore, gifted children are always considered as invaluable human resources with a lot of educational institutions, especially sports clubs as well as musical schools.
On the other hand, I agree that people possessing congenital abilities all can become the top sports, singers or musicians stars. But I strongly believe that others can also be professionals in certain fields as long as they have enough efforts. In fact, there are a large number of sportsmen born just with low IQ and finitely physical ability. Nevertheless, by attending intensive training lessons and doing daily exercises, they can compensate for their short of native skills. As a result, they still are excellent athletes and break many world new records, thus bringing a reputation for their countries.
In conclusion, some people think that just geniuses become professionals. I argue that although people with native capabilities can be the most talented persons in the areas they work in, others still be the top people if they have enough efforts and passion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...have enough efforts. In fact, there are a large number of sportsmen born just with low IQ and fin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18996415771 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73328924686 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7967293627 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.428571429 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258168014052 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790586018647 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423747829995 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152513870183 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031010792458 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.