It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
The development of consciousness of children is linked to the ability to distinguish between the matter of right and wrong, which is rather critical to children well-being. With sufficient time and reasonable educating efforts from parents, juvenile can acquire this vital ability. However, in my point of view, punishments may not be the best option for nurturing the young.
I strongly against the ideal of applying punishment with juvenile at any cost. Firstly, harsh punishments may entail unintended negative consequences which parents might fail to estimated. This may be a direct cause for adverse mental effects which a widely seen in a minor nowadays. A kid who suffered severe sanctions in its early age will likely have mental disorder in the future. Secondly, some strict disciplines employed by certain fathers might be abusive to the youngster, as well as violate the children protection law, which have no effects in helping the young to understand what is right and wrong. Furthermore, the child could have memorize such as possible actions, embed the idea of bullying in kid.
Therefore, in the case if sanctions are a must, then physical punishments and relentless actions shall not be allowed. There are other light punishments that teachers and parents can apply to discipline the minor, namely, detention and withdrawal of hobbies, games, privacy, or money. Moreover, let a youngster take the responsibility for the works and adjust themself as well as revised the situation is a brilliant way. By experiencing, juveniles will master the lessons naturally.
In sum up, sometimes, punishments may not be a utmost privilege. Instead of employing sanctions in educating, adults shall let the minor learn by practicing in reality and taking up responsibilities.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
2024-01-03 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
2023-12-17 | minhnhat230602 | 84 | view |
2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 67 | view |
2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK 62
- The chart below shows what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 647, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'memorized'.
Suggestion: memorized
...rong. Furthermore, the child could have memorize such as possible actions, embed the ide...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...m up, sometimes, punishments may not be a utmost privilege. Instead of employing ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31914893617 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00530188911 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63829787234 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.473207241 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21081300585 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587857413317 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331275716774 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113783379851 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432794957419 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.