It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages
Taking risks is the quality that makes people courageous and ready to face any challenge and many people believe that people should take risks in the daily and work life. This essay will discuss the benefits and demerits this ideology before making any conclusion.
To initiate with the positive side of taking risks, although there are myriad of benefits, yet the predominant one is the ability to face any obstacle in life. A person gains self-confidence and becomes resilient once he starts taking frequent risks. For such people, unforeseen opportunities rise that makes their life meaningful. For example, if a person with uplifting thoughts wants to change others self-destructive views, he has to take the risk of speaking up, even if it means going against someones's religion.
History is full of evidences that all the reforms that had taken place in the world, are because the prominent leader were courageous enough to take the risk of raising their voice against injustice, even if it meant to spend whole life in prison. Even in professional field, taking new chances develops a sense of pride and accomplishment and enhances creativity in an individual.
There might few disadvantages of taking risks as well. A person is never certain whether the end result of taking a risk will be in his favour or not. There might be loss of wealth in business or the case of embarrassment if the outcome is not as desired. Also, sometimes a person might not like taking the risk at all if it accompanied any kind of loss or insecurity.
To conclude, although taking risks has few demerits but the advantages are much higher in number. The disadvantages can further reduce if a person take every precaution and be a little careful before taking any kind of risk.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ideology before making any conclusion. To initiate with the positive side of ta...
^^^
Line 9, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or insecurity. To conclude, although taking risks has few demerits but the ad...
^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isks has few demerits but the advantages are much higher in number. The disadvant...
^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: higher
...w demerits but the advantages are much higher in number. The disadvantages can further reduce i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9397993311 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77237554299 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8084552729 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356813456287 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127100977846 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772147875588 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199772932298 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409646248973 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ideology before making any conclusion. To initiate with the positive side of ta...
^^^
Line 9, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... or insecurity. To conclude, although taking risks has few demerits but the ad...
^^
Line 9, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isks has few demerits but the advantages are much higher in number. The disadvant...
^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: higher
...w demerits but the advantages are much higher in number. The disadvantages can further reduce i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9397993311 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77237554299 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555183946488 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8084552729 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356813456287 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127100977846 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772147875588 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199772932298 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409646248973 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.