It is a natural process when animal species become extinct. There is no reason why people should stop happening this. Do you agree or disagree?
The process of disappearing animal’s kinds is often believed to be caused by nature. I strongly agree that people should not interfere in the activities of nature. Firstly this essay will discuss the possible damaging effect of people’s intervention, and secondly, it will analyze the wisdom of nature as higher intelligence.
The primary reason why humanity should not stop the process of fading some animal species is that there is a threat of making mistakes which could lead to the natural catastrophe. Rarely do people realize that humanity intruding as genetic Engineering in natural life can be a cause of a horrible mutation. Thus, By interfering in this process people could get unpredicted results as mass death of animals or epidemic catastrophes in the long run. For example, having researched asian insects British, scientists have revealed that genetic experiments under asian Bug led to the mutation, which became the cause of the epidemy in the asian region in 2003.
Another point to consider is that nature is more intelligent than humanity, at least during a few past billions of years. On no account should natural ways of acting should be ignored or argued by people. Therefore, by the extinction of some animal kinds, nature lets evolution move forward, create new species and eliminate unviable animals. A prime example is dinosaurs, if they had not perished, humanity probably would not have survived.
In conclusion, I am convinced that the key to success is not interfering in such a natural process as animal extinction. this is because it could make more harm than profit and, besides this, nature is wiser than humanity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...a natural process as animal extinction. this is because it could make more harm than...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21481481481 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81393992251 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5839887854 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.307692308 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321056120556 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102872938885 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690915354493 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17035055142 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281110292312 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.