Due to the technological advancements, People- such as researchers and travelers- can now move to isolated natural areas, like the South Pole. Although it is expensive and can be risky for visitors, they can acquire a great deal of knowledge as well as valuable experiences and memories.
On one hand, visiting the far-off places has some benefits. The greatest benefit of is that explorers, especially scientists, get robust knowledge. For instance, visiting these places, one learns about the life of animals which live far from humans. Another plus point for visitors, specifically tourists, is that it is interesting type of traveling, as it might be very exciting to explore new places and atmospheres, like the South Pole and Amazon jungle.
On the other hand, such type of traveling has drawbacks. The main challenge that travelers can face is that it can be very risky due to many reasons. Like, the temperature at the South Pole is normally very low that can affect them badly and if traveling in a forest then it could be dangerous because of the risk of being attacked by the animals. Another problem is that traveling such places requires a large amount of money to ensure safety and for investing in research. Therefore, only richer nations like the US, Canada, Australia can afford it.
Remote natural areas are now more accessible by virtue of advanced technology. While travelers require investment and can no double experience threats, it is, in fact, these risks which lead to the main pros of going to these places that is knowledge acquisition. It is the hardships that ultimately make the experience of traveling remote areas more advantageous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l as valuable experiences and memories. On one hand, visiting the far-off places...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80709663806 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576086956522 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3826689328 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181661822082 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664687889803 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600040575902 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112917631151 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329289307722 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.