It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
Exploring different places of the world is always beneficial for human life. In the early eras, it was difficult to travel the South Pole and the North Pole due to temperature and other environmental conditions. Now, it is easy because of technological development. The question is that “is this progress bring more advantages or destroy the life of creatures who are living there. According to the facts, this development would enhance the prosperity in the world, but it is two side coin, one is bad and other is good.
If we look on the bad side, then we will realize that only the South Pole and the North Pole are the places where human interaction is approximately zero. Therefore, natural environment for that area`s creature is not disturbed. Moreover, glaciers on the South Pole and the North Pole are huge and, if these glaciers melt then nothing will leave on this earth. In this context, it is better to not interfere that areas to save their lives and also our lives.
One the other side of coin, if scientist and tourist explore that remote places, then they will explore the many natural resources, which can be used to develop their countries. For instance, if they find the way to live there, then it would be easy to transfer different people there. The earth`s burden will reduce, so that quality of life will improve for human beings.
To sum up the arguments, it is better for scientist and tourist to explore the remote areas, so they bring easiness and comfort in the life of people. In this way, they can also save extinct species of animal there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...gical development. The question is that “is this progress bring more advantages o...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, as to, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76449275362 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54852867841 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514492753623 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7640367762 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9285714286 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265124953708 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828801826767 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439749510506 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152143392922 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291698335131 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.