It's generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for music and sport, and others are not. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both ideas by giving your opinion
“Talents are inherited, but they can be furnished too” Tara Westover, Educated, 2018. Which one is important than other: Genetics or Learning? Even though some people believe that certain talents such as musical or sports gifts are inherited, others posit the talents can be achieved by learning from the good sports person or musicians. As far as I am concerned, talents are the convoluted characteristics which can be achieved by both genetics and learning. In the following, I am inclined to put forth some examples to illustrate the concepts.
First and foremost, no prize for guessing that the genetics take a center stage in transferring specific gifts, talents, or characteristics to the next generation. For instance, Beethoven, a famous musician, had grown in the musicians’ family; his parent and brothers had a good track record as the famous musicians. Although he could learn music from them, he showed his talent when he was a 5 years’ child. It was extraordinary because it elucidated that he had not enough time to learn music. Indeed, the only thing coming to mind is inborn talents.
Another thing coming to the mind is that people can nourish their talents just by learning from others. For example, Michel Jordan is a famous American Basketball player. In fact, when he was a child, his father taught him to play basketball and after 12 years practicing and playing as a tyro basketball player, he finally could show and establish his position in American Basketball National Team. Thus based on the example, the fundamental role of learning is not deniable.
Last but not least, nevertheless many people believe merely in inborn or learned talents, some people claim that the mixture of the two factors is the main reason. As an illustrated case, physicians should learn various things about the diseases, drugs, etc., as well as, they must have inherited talents in the subject such as calculator mind, patience, and so forth. By accounting for the talents, there are only a few doctors who can change the medical researches’ future.
To wrap things up, it is obvious that talents can be transferred to the next generation genetically, however, they can be learned by many connoisseurs in different fields such as music and sports. According to the variegated cases, it seems that both maternal and learned elements play a staple role in forming people’s talents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...n be achieved by learning from the good sports person or musicians. As far as I am con...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing coming to mind is inborn talents. Another thing coming to the mind is that...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntal role of learning is not deniable. Last but not least, nevertheless many pe...
^^^^
Line 9, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... role in forming people's talents.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, another thing, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2037.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15696202532 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91114583436 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0884608741 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.210526316 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7894736842 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05263157895 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220496442443 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646161614006 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593740238174 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121187643813 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476637122053 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.