The key to solve environmental problem is simple. The present generation should have less comfortable like for the sake of future generation. To what extend do you agree?
Burgeoning environmental hazards are the wast issues in recent days. It is often mitigate by the sacrifice of current people in certain things to the betterment of forthcoming generations. However, in this essay agree with the statement because, which is every one responsibility to keep the earth in safe and secure for the next genesis.
To begin with, natural hazards are the outcome of human action irrespective of the sake of surroundings. People must considered to be the stability and severity of action which is harmful to the earth. At once, every individual should be aware about the consequences of earth on oneself and future. For example, excess rock crushing, sand mining, excessive consumption of fossil fuels would lead to dangerous to the earth. People must reduce the recommended behaviour towards the environment may enhance the longevity of natural resources in some extent for the future. Relinquish the use of vehicles, planning a material less buildings, decrease excess use of papers, produce recycling materials and so on.
Not to be outdone, every person should recognize the natural protecting schemes and in order to avoid certain product like plastics, in organic waste materials, unwanted E- waste and so on. Government should take action on improper waste disposal from the school age emphasize the better outcome for the next era. Furthermore, plant trees and other green amenities for the well being of atmosphere and flourish greenery to inhibit global warming and pollution to the core. For instance, Government of India offered plant a tree in a day program was success in around the states and reports the reduction of pollution than the previous years.
To sum up, amendments of past dangerous activity to the nature and save the earth by the give up of certain likes and desire to the benefit of earth and following generations. In my perception, solving adverse effects of environmental problem by the devoid of harmful actions and sacrifice of people who live in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-09 | Gurpinderothi | 89 | view |
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people argue that arts such as music and paintings are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Nowadays, most largecompanies operate multi-nationally. To what extentthose companies shouldhave responsibility towardslocal communities in whichthey operate? 56
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs What are the reasons for this What are the solutions to solve this 84
- Online people write opinions and reviews of services Is it a good thing or bad thing 70
Comments
Can somebody explain for me
Can somebody explain for me why the writer use " must considered to be the ... " in the whole " People must considered to be the stability and severity of action which is harmful to the earth. " ?? Thanks.
' People must considered to
' People must considered to be the stability and severity of action which is harmful to the earth.' is grammatically wrong.
should be:
People must consider the stability and severity of action harmful to the earth.
or:
People must consider the stability, because the severity of action is harmful to the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 623, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun buildings is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...he use of vehicles, planning a material less buildings, decrease excess use of paper...
^^^^
Line 3, column 628, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'building'?
Suggestion: building
...e of vehicles, planning a material less buildings, decrease excess use of papers, produce...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18404907975 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81729387761 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58282208589 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.037200599 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114528782709 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350555526496 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0223550125635 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665865557641 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00900458455481 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.