Machine translation (MT) is slower and less accurate than human translation and there is no immediate or predictable likelihood of machines taking over this role from humans. Do you agree or disagree?(Write at least 250 words)

There is no denying the fact that technology has given its impression on almost every work done manually in earlier times. Translation process of scripts is no exception which was considered to be handled by humans only. Although machine translation is offering a number of advantages to the people, still their dependency on these is not going to be a real phenomenon.

Well, many reasons are advocating this assumption. First of all, a machine is designed and equipped with a particular software, which has fixed set of codes and instructions. So, everytime it will process the language in the similar way whereas written script may consist the dialects from folklore or local language. In result of it, translations may have inconsistencies and errors.

Moreover, human interpreters take into consideration the words which are emphasized on, punctuation marks and sentiments related to the text or speech. Machine cannot predict the possible varied meanings of words which experts of that language can think of. They usually sense the emotions of the writer or speaker while interpretating something.

On the other hand, it is quite time consuming as machine need to search and match each word to its in- built dictionary. Overall, machine translation is not supposed to replace humans in coming time for having so many shortcomings. Human tranlators tend to be more accurate and specific in this context.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, whereas, while, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1195.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26431718062 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95746004076 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.678414096916 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6238874934 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9230769231 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227157567669 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703912076033 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399620628022 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125526454278 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034436289676 0.056905535591 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.