Many animals are being endangered by human activities both on land and in the sea. What actions can harm the existence of animals? What can be done to prevent this?
For years, human activities have brought serious threats to many animal species living on land and in the sea. While some actions have threatened the existence of wild animals, there are also practical solutions to prevent this from happening.
To begin with, two concerning humans’ activities should be pointed out for pushing animals to the verge of extinction. On land, the expansion of residential areas due to the population’s high demand for housing has lead to a higher rate of deforestation resulting in a huge loss of habitat for numerous species in the forest. Without food supply from botanical lives, wild animals will inevitably die of starving. If such action of humans does not cease, the scarcity of living resource in large scales will become the end of many animal species. Likewise, sea creatures are being killed radically by toxic waste from humans’ factories. In China, for instance, dead fishes floating on polluted water can be easily found in the ocean areas nearby humans’ factories.
To improve such situation, several measures should be seriously considered. The first step is to encourage vertical development in major cities as these areas can no longer provide enough on-the-ground accommodations for residents. As there are no limits when stacking apartments, the high demand for housing will be sufficiently provided. As a result, deforestation for construction purpose will not be needed and thus, animals’ home is conserved. The second step is to impose strict regulations on the act of disposing waste to the ocean. More specifically, manufacturers must install a waste treatment system which helps eliminate all toxic elements from the waste in factories before dumped to the sea.
In conclusion, there are some viable ways to protect animals from the threat of humans’ activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 2.0 24.0651302605 8% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41379310345 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04294275242 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.776652028 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27152568118 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897087640631 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057333988393 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166197309645 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616416767138 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.