Many animals are being hunted to the brink of extinction in order to fulfill the demand and greed of mankind for decorative purposes as well as for other reasons such as traditional medicine.
How could this be solved.
In recent decades, wildlife trafficking for home decoration and medicine industry has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this problem is be attributed by a whole host of reasons, some feasible solutions can be considered to address this.
In terms of government, there are some plausible resolutions that should be taken into account. First, by preventing motives of breaking laws, officials should enact strict terms to illegal wildlife smuggling. It means government can give penalties to criminals and put these people in jails for life sentences, which is the best way to reduce the wildlife trafficking. Second, if there are more environment programs in community, people will have higher awareness about the environmental protection. In fact, green campaigns taking place annually help to increase the scope of forestland, which is conducive to protect the natural ecosystem.
In addition, the importance of individuals to protect wild world is significant. First, each people can consume eco-friendly alternatives in lieu of accessories and medicines from animals. For example, people can replace decorative items or medicines by synthesis fabrics or green materials, which provides our animal world with enough time to reproduce and proliferate. Second, individuals play a vital role to eliminate wildlife smuggling in every their regular activities. For example, they can send a message or make a phone call to announce officials and police when they find out someone who commits the illegal wildlife trades, thereby the rate of lawbreakers in society will decrease considerably.
In conclusion, there are many actions to alleviate the wildlife trafficking. By enacting strict laws, government and every citizens contribute to raise awareness in their neighborhood and reduce the alarming rate of wildlife smuggling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...lic attention. Although this problem is be attributed by a whole host of reasons, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01282124208 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9228848493 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110820175041 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349020784834 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042925785309 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719187290842 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560557800912 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.