In many cities, planners tend to arrange shops, schools, offices, and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The way modern people live and work has experienced drastic changes. Many urban planners are deciding to separate shops, educational institutions and residential complexes in an attempt to fasten urban development and satisfy the needs of growing population. I personally think that the advantages are far more obvious.
Those who are against this idea may argue that it will add to the burden of the environment.People who did not have cars will have limited access to shop centers, schools. Thus, buying cars will be a necessity for them. Increased use of cars will emit harmful gases and aggravate the greenhouse effect. However, this is not so much a problem in the long term. The past 5 years have already witnessed the invention of cars and buses driven by electricity. We have the reason to believe that in the near future cars will not be a cause for environmental burden.
This will also contribute to people's satisfaction with life. The residential areas will be free from the noise and traffic and more worthy of spending most of our time in. Green areas surrounding the houses will also be more enjoyable when there is no sight of offices nearby.Our homes will be more of a place for leisure when there;s no skyscraper that constantly reminds us of a fast-paced city life. Highly concentrated commercial areas also mean lower prices of land in residential areas.All these are what we expect of a modern society.
In conclusion, I consider this to be a positive trend. Separated areas better suits the demands of growing number of citizens. Of course, city plans should make sure that schools are not far from the housing areas so that students will profit from this plan.
Comments
The way modern people live…
The way modern people live and work has experienced drastic changes. Many urban planners are deciding to separate shops, educational institutions and residential complexes in an attempt to fasten urban development and satisfy the needs of growing population. I personally think that the advantages are far more obvious.
Those who are against this idea may argue that it will add to the burden of the environment.People who did not have cars will have limited access to shop centers, schools. Thus, buying cars will be a necessity for them. Increased use of cars will emit harmful gases and aggravate the greenhouse effect. However, this is not so much a problem in the long term. The past 5 years have already witnessed the invention of cars and buses driven by electricity. We have the reason to believe that in the near future cars will not be a cause for environmental burden.
This will also contribute to people's satisfaction with life. The residential areas will be free from the noise and traffic and more worthy of spending most of our time in. Green areas surrounding the houses will also be more enjoyable when there is no sight of offices nearby.Our homes will be more of a place for leisure when there;s no skyscraper that constantly reminds us of a fast-paced city life. Highly concentrated commercial areas also mean lower prices of land in residential areas.All these are what we expect of a modern society.
In conclusion, I consider this to be a positive trend. Separated areas better suits the demands of growing number of citizens. Of course, city plans should make sure that schools are not far from the housing areas so that students will profit from this plan.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: People
...ll add to the burden of the environment.People who did not have cars will have limited...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...burden. This will also contribute to peoples satisfaction with life. The residential...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Our
...hen there is no sight of offices nearby.Our homes will be more of a place for leisu...
^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: All
...wer prices of land in residential areas.All these are what we expect of a modern so...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91958041958 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75498072996 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597902097902 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.6811977251 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9375 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9375 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104916944484 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337652127922 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372168242862 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719976783474 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395725675327 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.