In many countries, fast food is becoming cheaper and more available. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, the world is observing the expansion of fast-food chains with its increasing affordability and availability. From my point of view, this trend creates more drawbacks than benefits.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that this development can have some possible advantages. Fast food is becoming cheaper, leading to the rise in the consumption of customers, thus can not only help fast-food businesses make a great profit but also enhance national budgets. In addition, the growing availability and affordability of junk food allow people with hectic schedules to have a complete meal at a reasonable price at any time they want. Therefore, these individuals can save time and effort to enjoy themselves and work more productively.
Despite these above arguments, I believe that the demerits of this development can eclipse its aforementioned merits. The cheaper and more popular fast food gets, the more often people may buy this dish. As these customers consume junk food on a regular basis, they would be more prone to obesity, cancer and heart diseases, which are serious health problems. Moreover, as fast food cost less to purchase, the sales of this would increase. As a result, junk food becomes profit-driven, making its producers overlook the food safety standards, which means ingredients used to make fast food can be reused several times. Consequently, this food becomes unwholesome and is associated with diseases such as food poisoning, diarrhea, and digestive disorder.
In conclusion, although fast food becoming cheaper and more available may yield some benefits, I would contend that the disadvantages of this trend would be more serious.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37262357414 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95201054577 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9773109543 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.692307692 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330280111369 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123706013177 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747453457879 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21552997769 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698713225634 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.