Due to wide gap between rural and urban tracts of a nation, many people are of the opinion that new teachers and doctors should provide their services to the rural areas. However, there are some people who argue it is the teachers or doctors wish to decide where to work. I will further discuss both sides of the argument.
There are many advantages to the fresh teachers and doctors by working in rural areas. Firstly, the people in the rural areas can have access to medical facilities and education. Secondly, the teachers and doctors who are fresh from universities and with sound knowledge can translate their theoretical knowledge into practical knowledge. Thirdly, there are many doctors and teachers in urban areas. So, no institution would opt for fresh candidates. Therefore, these candidates can gain lots of experience in their early years of career and some teachers and doctors can even stay in the rural area to serve the people in that locality.
However, there are some people who argue that in a democratic country like India, people have their right to choose where to work. It is often true that if people are sent to rural areas without their will, they may work passively and the villagers do not get any benefit from their services. Secondly, there will be fewer and fewer students who would choose such type of jobs and in the long run, there would be shortage of jobs.
I believe that government should send the fresh doctors and teachers to rural areas for work and provide them with some incentives and high salaries which would further help to bridge the gap between rural and urban areas.
To conclude, in order to improve the condition of rural people, the government should send fresh doctors and teachers to rural areas by providing them with benefits such as high pay and incentives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who argue it is the teachers or doctors wish to decide where to work. I will fur...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86217948718 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34919718196 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4514387659 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342710664604 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135147391849 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830132549698 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203441965695 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486961353315 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.