In many countries, an increase in crime has been blamed on violent images on television and in computer and video games. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In many countries, violence on television and in computer and video games as a link to an increase in crime has been widely discussed in recent years. From my perspective, I am not convinced that the violence in the entertainment media is responsible for the increasing crime rate in society.
First of all, not any child watching brutalities in movies or games are badly affected. For instance, many children enjoy watching action movies and playing video games with their family members, but they are still fine in terms of their character and personality. The young also understand well that what they see on television and in games are unrealistic things made up just for entertainment purpose; hence, they will not try to imitate such actions.
Moreover, children are mostly influenced by the people they grow up with. Therefore, their antisocial behavior or even criminal tendencies may proceed from their parents’ inappropriate demeanor and dissolute friends. Research indicates that the majority of criminals come from underprivileged families in which parents are uneducated. In some cases, many offenders admit having participated out of their friends’ enticement.
Opponents may argue that entertainment media is the root cause of the increase in crime rate. However, there is probably no concrete evidence for that fact. Also, in a great number of regions, the high crime rate often results from some other reasons such as poverty and political instability. Obviously, violence in games and movies can not be held responsible for the increase in crime.
To sum up, there is a variety of contributory factors in the development of crime commitment. Therefore, the entertainment media cannot be considered the main cause of increasing crime rate in community.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, for instance, such as, first of all, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35587188612 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04834963646 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5871886121 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2616418088 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164881068752 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561457163128 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753606269147 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991990408321 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767699974437 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.